Still working on a good combination of Notes, References and Bibliography that is functional yet easy to read using the wikicite template that's already here. I did some work on T-55 that I hope shows better what I mean. The system may seem cumbersome if you are repeating a reference that has different page numbers but I have found that happens less than you might think and there's much more to be gained by combining the two, namely because you can assign names to references that don't change and it's much easier to read a combined notes and references section that uses lots of written references and reliable web citations. It's not just readability that suffers but using Harvard referencing negates much of the advantage that a wiki has over paper, namely the flexibility of an inline citation that combines reference citation information and an expository note that are grouped together rather than having one be separate from the other and that is linked right back to the sentence you were reading. I understand that sometimes in Wikipedia "it's damned if you do and damned if you don't" but in looking over the article it seems that the use of Harvard style referencing and the use of separate Notes and References sections really effects the readability of the article and some are using it and some aren't. T-34's and KV-1's were breaking down because they weren't thoroughly tested before seeing combat while the older tanks were breaking down because they weren't being maintained well enough.- Senor Freebie ( talk) 07:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Citation style and consistency "References and Notes" So if an armoured vehicle broke down, it was a loss because it would be in German hands sometimes in mere minutes. The nature of the warfare at the start from the Soviet perspective was fighting on a rapidly disintegrating front. Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.176.40.79 ( talk) 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC) The source probably refers to all tanks. How on Earth they could be "old" in 1941? Disrepair is a bit more plausible but all in all, it sounds more like old Soviet song "we weren't ready for the war" rather than solid facts. The tank is new, it just started to be produced in 1940. "At least half the first summer's total tank losses were due to breakdowns rather than German fire, although this also included old tanks in disrepair" 44 Time to split T34-76 and T34-85 articles ?.40 Strange Parallel with the Sherman M4.32 This isn't really about the T-34 at all is it?.27 File:P82-2l.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion.20 Huge article, but useless without a 'center'.
#La cimbali m2 barsystem error 66 fix movie#
10 Adding movie of recovering T-34 from bog/lake.2 Citation style and consistency "References and Notes".
0 kommentar(er)
